Allowed

Bajrangi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC15 Oct 2015CR. MISC./27895/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner, who was in custody for over six months, in connection with a dacoity case involving firearms and ornaments. The court directed release on executing a bail bond after framing of charges.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is directed to be released on bail after framing of charge on execution of a bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties.

Bajrangi Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27895 of 2015 (3) dt.15-10-2015

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.27895 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -36 Year- 2015 Thana -MAHESHKHUNT District- KHAGARIA ====================================================== 1. Bajrangi Kumar Son of Bahro Sah resident of village - Nijay, Police Station - Birpur, District - Lakhisarai .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Suresh Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Asha Devi(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 3 15-10-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State. Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Maheshkhut P.S. Case No. 36 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 399, 412/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25 (1-b)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. Allegedly on receipt of the telephonic information that some miscreants were fleeing away after committing dacoity, the informant and other police personnel started checking vehicles, in that course, one motorcycle coming towards Choutham suddenly stopped and two persons started fleeing away but were apprehended and from possession of the petitioner one country made pistol alongwith one live cartridges, one motorcycle bearing

¶3

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27895 of 2015 (3) dt.15-10-2015

¶4

Registration No. BR34-J/4201, two mobile sets, three pair of earrings and gas cutter machine kept in dickey of the motorcycle, was recovered.

¶5

Submission is that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 19.03.2015. Chargesheet has already been submitted. There is no report regarding theft of ear-rings. Co-accused Arvind Kumar, from whose possession ornaments and mobile sets have been recovered, has already been granted bail vide order dated 29.07.2015 passed in Criminal Misc. No. 26752 of 2015 and the petitioner by remaining in custody for more than 6 months has been sufficiently penalized, to which learned A.P.P. opposes by submitting that the victims have identified ornaments and recovered motorcycle which was looted property of the renter.

¶6

In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering that chargesheet has already been submitted and as, such, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail after framing of charge on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria arising out of Maheshkhut P.S. Case No. 36 of 2015 subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within

¶7

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27895 of 2015 (3) dt.15-10-2015

¶8

the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

¶9

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J)

¶10

sushma/-

¶11

Bajrangi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bajrangi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abhiram Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Kant Lal Sharma and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Azad and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Sanjay Rawat and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Sonu Burnwal @ Vikash Kr. Bharti Vs The State Of Bihar

Amit Singh Yadav Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.