Raju Sah v. The State Of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
This short order confirmed the provisional bail of the petitioner, an accused husband in a domestic violence case. The court noted the complainant's non-appearance and the existence of a charge-sheet, finding sympathetic grounds in the petitioner's custody since March 2015.
What did the court decide?
Confirmation of provisional bail granted on 18.06.2015.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.25448 of 2015
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -68 Year- 2015 Thana -DUMRAUN District- BUXAR
====================================================== 1. Raju Sah Son of Gupat Sah @ Gupteshwar Sah, resident of Mohalla- Thakur Lohar ki Gali, Dumraon, P.S.- Dumraon, Dsitrict- Buxer. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Punam Devi D/o Umashankar Sah R/o Village Dhandchhuan, P.S. Navanagar, Distt. Buxar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bachan Jee Ojha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nagendra Pd.(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER
4 08-10-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.
In spite of all the efforts taken, the informant did not appear though the petitioner has served a copy of bail petition to the complainant personally through Chaukidar which is evident from supplementary affidavit.
Allegedly the petitioner being the husband of the informant, due to non-fulfillment of demand of motor-cycle tortured the informant in various ways and further tried to cut her with sharp edged Fasuli but due to assemblance of nearby person, she was saved.
Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner is always ready to keep his wife with full dignity and honour but she does not want to live with petitioner, which is
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner deserves confirmation of provisional bail despite the informant's non-appearance and allegations of domestic torture.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Raju Sah
- respondent
The State of Bihar
- respondent
Punam Devi
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court