Allowed

Pavan Kumar @ Pawan Sharma v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC5 Jan 2015CR. MISC./24986/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous petition granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner apprehending arrest in a State of Bihar complaint case. The petitioner, an employee of the firm accused of cheating a complainant over a power tiller, was released on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of similar amount.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail by surrender within one month on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each before the 1st Class Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad.

Pavan Kumar @ Pawan Sharma Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.24986 of 2014

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1092 Year- 2010 Thana -JEHANABAD COMPLAINT CASE DistrictJEHANABAD ====================================================== Pavan Kumar @ Pawan Sharma S/o Sri Bhola Sharma Resident of villageSabdalpur, P .S- Makhdumpur, District- Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Naresh Prasad Son of Late Deo Charan Singh Resident of villageNeeshara Chak, P.O and P.S Ghosi, District- Jehanabad. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Naresh Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. S.Eheteshamuddin (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 5 05-01-2015 Previous order dated 4.12.2014 has already been complied by filing the Photostat copy of the certified copy of entire order sheet of Complaint Case No.1092 of 2010. No one is present on behalf of the O.P.No.2 though Vakalatnama on behalf of the O.P.No.2 has been filed which is on the record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.1092 of 2010 in which cognizance has been taken for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 149,

¶3

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24986 of 2014 (5) dt.05-01-2015

¶4

2/3

¶5

323, 504, 406, 420, 379 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

¶6

Allegedly, the complainant had purchased a power tiller from the firm of one Kaushalendra Kumar and thereafter Kaushalendra Kumar along with other accused persons went at the house of the complainant and took away the power tiller on the ground to provide subsidy and, accordingly, the complainant handed over the power tiller to the accused persons and in such way accused persons cheated the complainant and misappropriated the power tiller.

¶7

Submission at bar is that the petitioner is one of the staffs of the said firm which is being run by Kaushalendra Kumar and one co- accused Ranjan Kumar had been allowed regular bail by learned District & Sessions Judge vide B.P.No.517 of 2013 and the petitioner apprehending his arrest has come before this Court.

¶8

No offence is made out against the petitioner and, as such, he deserves sympathetic consideration to which learned A.P.P. opposes.

¶9

Allegedly, the petitioner is one of the staffs in the said firm and, as such, the petitioner in case of his arrest or surrender before the court below within one month shall be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial

¶10

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24986 of 2014 (5) dt.05-01-2015

¶11

3/3

¶12

Magistrate 1^st Class, Jehanabad, in Complaint Case No.1092 of 2010. with condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C.

¶13

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J)

¶14

AnilKrSinha/-
U T

Pavan Kumar @ Pawan Sharma v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pavan Kumar @ Pawan Sharma v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chhotelal Ram @ Chhotelal Harizan Vs The State Of Bihar

Manjay Ram Vs The State Of Bihar

Randhir Kumar @ Randhir Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Kunti Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Munna Ram @ Munna Kumar Ram And Others Vs The State Of Bihar

Guriya Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar