Allowed

Manager Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC25 Jun 2015CR. MISC./20651/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail sought by petitioners in a criminal case involving alleged misappropriation of a truck. The High Court granted bail subject to furnishing a bond and providing sureties within four weeks, invoking section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of like amount before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan, within four weeks.

Manager Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.20651 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -253 Year- 2013 Thana -MAHARAJGANJ District- SIWAN ====================================================== 1. Manager Yadav Son of Mahesh Yadav 2. Pappu Yadav Son of Manager Yadav Both residents of VillageBishunpura, P.s Vijaipur, district Gopalganj. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Javed Aslam For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Amrendra Prasad(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 25-06-2015 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Maharajganj PS case No. 253/2013 for the offence under section 420, 406, 323, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶3

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The prosecution story, in brief, is that the petitioners and other accused persons took away the truck of the informant worth Rs. 16,00000/- by giving an assurance to pay installments of the loan taken in relation to the truck and half profit of the business of the truck to the informant but allegedly neither giving the said installments and profit nor returned the truck to the informant.

¶4

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that

¶5

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20651 of 2015 (2) dt.25-06-2015

¶6

2/2

¶7

the petitioners have no criminal antecedents. Further, as per allegation, the informant had given the truck in question to the petitioners with condition that he will pay bank installments and at the same time 50% of profit from running the truck. It has further been submitted that there is no documentary evidence to substantiate the allegation made in the FIR. Further, it has been submitted that if the aforesaid allegation is accepted to be true still the informant ought to have filed a civil suit for the specific performance of contract.

¶8

On behalf of the State it has been submitted that the petitioners are named in the first information.

¶9

Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in connection with Maharajganj PS case No. 253/2013, subject to condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C.

¶10

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶11

BKS/U T

Manager Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manager Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Laldeo Sahni and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Chandra Shekhar Sahni @ Chandan Sahni Vs The State Of Bihar

Manish Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Ganga Prasad Choudhary Vs The State Of Bihar

Chitranjan Singh Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Afzal Mian Vs State of Bihar