Allowed

Santosh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through Vigilance Commissioner cabinet Vigilance, Bihar

Patna HC1 Oct 2015CR. MISC./19882/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge of Patna High Court granted bail to Santosh Kumar and Radhey Prasad Chaurasiya in two criminal miscellaneous petitions. Petitioners were accused of forgery and corruption arising from fake FSL reports. Court ordered release on bail bond of Rs. 10,000 each with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Shastrinagar P.S. Case No. 175 of 2007.

Santosh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar Through Vigilance Commissioner… — Corruption | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.19882 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -175 Year- 2007 Thana -SHASTRINAGAR District- PATNA

¶3

====================================================== 1. Santosh Kumar son of Late Amarendra Kumar Jha, resident of 18, Manas Marg, Road No. 2, West Shivpuri, P.S.- Shastrinagar, Dist- Patna .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Vigilance Commissioner (Cabinet Vigilance), Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.21839 of 2015

¶4

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -175 Year- 2007 Thana -SHASTRINAGAR District- PATNA

¶5

====================================================== 1. Radhey Prasad Chaurasiya son of late Bhagat Chaurasiay Resident of Ram Janki Nagar, gonma Road, Harnaut, P.s. Harnaut, District Nalanda.

¶6

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar null null

¶8

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : (In Cr.Misc. No.19882 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Tuhin Shankar For the Vigilance : Mr. Santosh Pandey (In Cr.Misc. No.21839 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bibhuti Pd. Pandey For the Vigilance : Mr. Santosh Pandey. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 4 01-10-2015 Both the above-said petitions arise out of Shastrinagar P.S. Case No. 175 of 2007 corresponding to Special Case No. 13 of 2011 registered under Sections-466, 467, 468,471, 474, 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section-13(2) read with Section13(i)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and accordingly, both

¶9

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19882 of 2015 (4) dt.01-10-2015

¶10

2/3

¶11

the above-said petitions are being heard and disposed of by this common order.

¶12

Heard learned counsels for the petitioners as well as learned counsel appearing for the Vigilance.

¶13

Petitioner in Cr. Misc. No. 19882 of 2015 was working as Assistant Scientist in Forensic Science Laboratory, Bihar, Patna and in course of investigation, it came to light that it was coaccused, Mustaque Ahmed, who was also an employee of Forensic Science Laboratory, Bihar, Patna, prepared the fake reports though it is alleged that the petitioner in Cr. Misc. No. 19882 of 2015 also helped the above-said co-accused in preparing the fake and forged reports. So far as petitioner in Cr. Misc. No. 21839 of 2015 is concerned; he was accused in Harnaut P.S. Case No. 195 of 2009 and in his case, a forged FSL report was produced before the court though at the time of production of the aforesaid report, petitioner in Cr. Misc. No. 21839 of 2015 was in jail custody in connection with Harnaut P.S. Case No. 195 of 2009.

¶14

Learned counsel, appearing in Cr. Misc. No. 19882 of 2015 submits that co-accused Mustaque Ahmed has already been granted privilege of bail by learned court below itself whereas; the petitioner in Cr. Misc. No. 19882 of 2015 is languishing in jail custody since long.

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19882 of 2015 (4) dt.01-10-2015

¶16

3/3

¶17

Learned counsel, appearing in Cr. Misc. No. 21839 of 2015 submits that petitioner has already been acquitted in Harnaut P.S. Case No. 195 of 2009 and in the present case, it can only be said that he was a beneficiary of the aforesaid fake report.

¶18

Considering the above-said submission as well as facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Shastrinagar P.S. Case No. 175 of 2007 corresponding to Special Case No. 13 of 2011 to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Vigilance-Ist, Patna.

¶19

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)

¶20

A.K.V./-

¶21

U T

Santosh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through Vigilance Commissioner cabinet Vigilance, Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santosh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through Vigilance Commissioner cabinet Vigilance, Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Awadhesh Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar

Dinesh Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Vikram Yadav and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Manzoor Vs The State Of Bihar

Navin Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Mukesh Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar