This bench declined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner who apprehended arrest under Sections 341, 323, 307, and 504 IPC. The court noted the gravity of offences including head injury and fracture. The bail petition was dismissed.
Anticipatory bail application dismissed; petitioner not inclined to be granted bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.19127 of 2013
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -435 Year- 2012 Thana -JAHANABAD District- JEHANABAD ====================================================== Dularchand Bind, Son of Bishundeo Bind, Resident of Village Parshurampur, Police Station Jehanabad (Kalpa O.P.) in the district of Jehanabad .... .... Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP Mrs. Nirmala Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
8 06-05-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19127 of 2013 (8) dt.06-05-2015
2/2
this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The bail petition stands dismissed.
(Vikash Jain, J)
B.T/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner apprehending arrest in the P.S. Case No.435 of 2012
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dularchand Bind
The State Of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
