Allowed

Appu Pandey v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC3 Sept 2015CR. MISC./18145/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a dowry harassment case under Section 498A IPC. The court directed the petitioner to deposit Rs. 1,500 monthly in the lower court for release to the complainant, subject to furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail if arrested; directed to deposit Rs. 1500/month in lower court; to furnish bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties within six weeks.

Appu Pandey Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Maintenance and Alimony | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.18145 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -741 Year- 2014 Thana -SARAN COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSARAN

¶3

====================================================== 1. Appu Pandey Son of Malik Pandey Resident of village - Semraha, P.S. Panapur, District - Saran

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

Riya Devi Wife of Appu Pandey, Daughter of Chadra Bhushan Tiwari Resident of village - Semraha, P.S. Panapur, District - Saran At Present C/o Chandra Bhushan Tiwari, Resident of village - Mangolapur, P.S. Jalalpur, District - Saran

¶8

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. M.K.Nirala(App)

¶11

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 03-09-2015 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 741 of 2014 for the offences instituted under Sections 498(A) of the I.P.C.

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶14

The accusation is of demand of dowry and on nonfulfilment of the same torture was inflicted by the accused persons.

¶15

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that the petitioner is ready to keep the complainant but the same is

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18145 of 2015 (3) dt.03-09-2015 P2/2

¶17

not acceptable to her. It is further submitted that the petitioner is ready to deposit an amount of Rs. 1500/- per month in the court below which may be released in favour of the complainant.

¶18

On behalf of the State it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is directed that the petitioner shall deposit an amount of Rs. 1500/per month in the court below which shall be released in favour of the complainant and on doing so, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Complaint Case No. 741 of 2014 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Saran at Chapra subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶20

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶21

Saif/U

Appu Pandey v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Appu Pandey v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gopi Kishan Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Bhanu Kumar Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Deepak Singh @ Deepak Kumar Singh and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Mojib @ Mojib. and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Shahnawaz Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Nishi Bhushan Singh Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.