Dismissed

Hiro Kumar @ Jyoti Ranjan and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC15 May 2015CR. MISC./17492/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court held an application for anticipatory bail not maintainable as anticipatory bail was already granted by Sessions Judge, with surrender period lapsing. Court directed the lower court to consider regular bail if petitioners surrender within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Informing lower court to consider prayer for regular bail if petitioners surrender within six weeks from today.

Hiro Kumar @ Jyoti Ranjan and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.17492 of 2015

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -84 Year- 2014 Thana -BIKRAMGANJ District- SASARAM

¶4

(ROHTAS)

¶5

====================================================== 1. Hiro Kumar @ Jyoti Ranjan, S/o Chandradeep Singh 2. Chhote Kumar, S/o Late Chandrama Singh Both resident of village- Tenduni, P.S.- Bikramganj, District- Rohtas .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh No-10, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dinesh Singh (App)

¶6

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶7

2 15-05-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the

¶8

State.

¶9

The present application has been filed for prayer of anticipatory bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 379, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶10

The petitioners were granted anticipatory bail by learned Sessions Judge vide order dated 17.09.2014 passed in A.B.P. No. 1942 of 2014, but the petitioners could not surrender to execute bail bond within the stipulated period of six weeks. Subsequently, the petitioner filed an application before the learned Sessions Judge for extending the period of surrender. The same was rejected vide order dated 12.02.2015 vide Cr. Misc. No. 33 of 2015.

¶11

In the circumstances, the present application for

¶12

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17492 of 2015 (2) dt.15-05-2015

¶13

¶14

anticipatory bail is not maintainable. Since the petitioner has been granted anticipatory bail on merits by learned Sessions Judge, let the learned court below consider the prayer for regular bail of the petitioners, if the petitioners surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 84 of 2014, pending in the court of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bikramganj. It is expected that learned court below will dispose of the application for regular bail preferably on the same day.

¶15

With the above observation this application is disposed of.

¶16

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶17

P.K./-

¶18

U T

Hiro Kumar @ Jyoti Ranjan and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hiro Kumar @ Jyoti Ranjan and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sukhari Das Vs The State Of Bihar

Arun Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Amarjet Kumar Mandal @ Amarjeet Kumar Mandal @ Chhaila Vs The State Of Bihar

Abhilash Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Hiramani Devi @ Hira Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Mustaque Ahmad @ Mustaque Alam Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.