Allowed

Dinesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC23 Jun 2015CR. MISC./17404/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court considered a bail petition filed by Dinesh Yadav in a criminal chargesheet case arising out of an alleged poisoning incident involves unidentified assailants. The court assessed the case diary noting lack of eyewitnesses but suspicion against the petitioner based on his relationship and involvement in property disputes. Order grants bail.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail by furnishing bond of Rs 10000 and two sureties of each Rs 10000 to the Judicial Magistrate, First Class Gaya.

Dinesh Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17404 of 2015 (03) dt.23-06-2015

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶3

Criminal Miscellaneous No.17404 of 2015

¶4

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -248 Year- 2014 Thana -KHIJARSARAI District- GAYA

¶5

====================================================== Dinesh Yadav .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Kumar No-2-Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. S. D. Singh Yadav (A.P.P.) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER 03 23-06-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the informant.

¶6

Deceased, Pintu Kumar, who happens to be uncle of informant Mirtunjay Kumar came running on 10.12.2014 at 8.00 a.m. and disclosed that four persons, who have had concealed their face, assaulted him and then, had administered poisonous substance. At that very moment, deceased vomited. Deceased was taken to local hospital and from there, to P.M.C.H. where he died and accordingly, F.I.R. has been registered against unknown.

¶7

Chargesheet has already been submitted against the petitioner. However, from perusal of the case diary, it is apparent that none happens to be an eye witness to occurrence. Presence of petitioner has been perceived in the background of having digested

¶8

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17404 of 2015 (03) dt.23-06-2015

¶9

Rs.50,000/- belonging to the deceased, who was a Teacher in a Government School along with Ashutosh. Furthermore, it has also been stated by the witnesses that Ashutosh’s wife Kiran happens to be a Teacher in the same school and there happens to be some sort of grievances on account of payment of commission during course of construction of school building. It has also been disclosed by the witnesses that petitioner happens to be Samdhi of Uday, who was on strained relationship with his brother Pankaj and for that, Uday had suspected hands of deceased. So, the witnesses including the informant as is evident from Paragraphs-8 and 18 along with other paragraphs of the case diary merely suspected his active involvement.

¶10

Thus, petitioner, Dinesh Yadav is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Miss Akanksha Kashyap, Judicial Magistrate, 1^st Class, Gaya in connection with Khizar Sarai P. S. Case no.248 of 2014.

¶11

(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J)

¶12

Vikash/-

¶13

U T

Dinesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dinesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Kaushar Vs The State Of Bihar

Lallu Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Japo Mahton@Rakesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Rahul Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Shankar Mukhiya Vs The State Of Bihar

Shivnath Prasad @ Shivnath Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar