The single-judge High Court at Patna rejected the application filed by the petitioner for modification of an earlier order, dismissing it as completely misconceived.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.17021 of 2015 ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
| Ghanshyam Tiwari, Son of Ram Sewak Tiwari, Resident of village- Narma, P.S.- Fathua, District- Patna .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Rahul Kishore, Son of Late Sushil Kumar @ Babban Singh, Resident of village- Narma, P.S.- Fathua, District- Patna .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER |
|
| 2 | 15-04-2015 The present application filed by the petitioner for |
| modification of the order dated 11.03.2015 passed in Cr.Misc.No.27648 of 2012 is completely misconceived. The same is, accordingly, dismissed. (Birendra Prasad Verma, J) |
Arvind/U T
Ghanshyam Tiwari
The State of Bihar
Rahul Kishore
Birendra Prasad Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
