Lawkush Saw @ Lawkush Sah v. The State Of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
The Patna High Court confirmed the provisional anticipatory bail already granted by the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate to the petitioner for offences under Sections 498A IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, imposing a condition of monthly monetary deposit.
What did the court decide?
The provisional anticipatory bail granted by the lower court is confirmed, subject to a condition of depositing Rs.1000 per month.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.15844 of 2014
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -394 Year- 2013 Thana -ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Lawkush Saw @ Lawkush Sah, Son of Bhagwat Saw, resident of village - Konauli, P.S. - Rajpur, District - Buxar .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Saroj Debi, w/o Lawkush Saw D/o Ashok Saw, Resident of Parsathua, P.S. Parsathua, P.S. Kochas, District Rohtas .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Madhukar Mishra, Advocate For the State : APP For O.P. No. 2 : Mr. S.M. Shabbir Alam, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
9 28-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State assisted by learned counsel for opposite party no.2. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act registered in connection with Complaint Case No. 394 of 2013.
- It is submitted that the parties were married about four years ago. In any event, it is further submitted that the petitioner offers to deposit a sum of Rs.1000/- per month regularly for benefit of the opposite party no. 2.
- Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 appears
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15844 of 2014 (9) dt.28-01-2015
2/2
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to confirm the provisional anticipatory bail granted by the lower court subject to a condition of monthly deposit.
Whether the condition of maintaining a monthly deposit of Rs.1000/- is reasonable.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Lawkush Saw @ Lawkush Sah
- respondent
The State of Bihar
- respondent
Saroj Debi
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court