Oral order granting bail to the petitioner in a criminal case after finding that the alleged firing did not injure anyone and the firearm was recovered by a private person, subject to furnishing bail bonds and sureties.
Petitioner released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.13365 of 2015
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -108 Year- 2014 Thana -KASIMBAZAR District- MUNGER ====================================================== 1. Dilip Kumar Das @ Dilip Das son of Sri Laxman Das resident of Mohalla - Belan Bazar (Lalu Pokhar) P.S. - Kasim Bazar, District - Munger. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Chandra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 2 18-05-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Taking into consideration that the alleged firing of the petitioner did not hit to any person and the firearm is said to have been recovered by private person, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Munger in connection with kasim Bazar P.S.Case No. 108 of 2014. (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) Namita/-
U T
Dilip Kumar Das @ Dilip Das
The State of Bihar
Hemant Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
