The Patna High Court dismissed a criminal petition seeking quashing of the Madhya Magistrate's prima facie order, allowing petitioners to raise objections at the charge-framing stage.
The petition stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.13194 of 2013
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -27 Year- 2012 Thana -MAHILA P.S. District- SAHARSA
=========================================================== 1. Manoj Kumar Singh, son of Fuleshwar Prasad Singh
.... .... Petitioners Versus
.... .... Opposite Parties
=========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP
=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 09-07-2015
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned
APP for the State.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13194 of 2013 dt.09-07-2015
2/2
the basis of charge sheet and case dairy, and after finding a prima facie case was made out against the petitioners on the basis of accusations in the FIR, cognizance has been taken.
(Vikash Jain, J)
B.T/U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the Magistrate's order of taking cognizance prima facie.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Manoj Kumar Singh and others
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
