Allowed

Arbind Kumar v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC12 Mar 2015CR. MISC./10380/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna released the petitioner on bail. The petitioner had earlier been granted anticipatory bail, which was cancelled following a complaint by his wife regarding alleged ill behaviour. Since no reconciliation appeared possible after he had been in jail custody, the court ordered his release on bail.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner was ordered to be released on bail by furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount.

Arbind Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.10380 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -164 Year- 2011 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPATNA ====================================================== 1. Arbind Kumar son of Rajendra Yadav resident of village Gosaingaon, P.s. Ghoswari, District Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Kunti Devi Wife of Arbind Kumar resident of Mora Tala P.S. Rahui District Nalanda at present resident of Hasanchak, P.O. Bahranwa P.S. Barh, District Patna. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Suresh Pd.Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 2 12-03-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is husband of the complainant and earlier he was granted privilege of anticipatory bail with condition that he would keep the complainant with full honour and dignity. In pursuance of the direction of this Court the petitioner took the complainant to his home but after some time complainant made complain to the court below about so called ill behaviour of the petitioner resulting cancellation of his bail bonds. Petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 10.12.2014 and it appears that there is no chance of reconciliation accordingly, petitioner is

¶3

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10380 of 2015 (2) dt.12-03-2015

¶4

2/2

¶5

directed to be released on bail.

¶6

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of SubDivisional Judicial Magistrate, Barh, Patna in connection with Complaint Case No. 164( C) of 2011.

¶7

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)

¶8

Namita/-

¶9

U T

Arbind Kumar v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arbind Kumar v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bijendra Yadav @ Bijendra @ Bagar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Jitendra Poddar Vs The State Of Bihar

Abhishek Anand Vs The State Of Bihar

Hareram Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar

Kajal Singh Kushwaha Vs The State Of Bihar

Rampati Ram and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar