Dismissed

Janardan Thakur and Ors. v. State of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC17 Mar 2015L.P.A/1199/1996

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Letters Patent Appeal challenges the dismissal of a writ petition concerning a preemption claim. The High Court held that the lower courts consistently found the vendee was not a boundary tenant. The court refused to re-appraise evidence at the writ stage or entertain the claim that the appellant would become landless, dismissing the appeal.

What did the court decide?

The appeal was dismissed with no relief granted to the appellant.

Janardan Thakur and Ors. Vs State of Bihar and Ors. — Partition | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Letters Patent Appeal No.1199 of 1996 IN

¶3

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 4190 of 85

¶4

=========================================================== 1. Janardan Thakur, Son of Late Harihar Thakur, Resident of Village Rasulpur Gangti, Police Station Goraul, District - Vaishali

¶5

1. Shiv Chandra Thakur, Son of Late Harihar Thakur, Resident of Village Rasulpur Gangti, Police Station Goraul, District - Vaishali

¶6

1. Sheela Devi, Wife of Shri Kishori Thakur, Resident of Village Rasulpur Gangti, Police Station Goraul, District - Vaishali

¶7

1. Darbesari Devi Wife of Late Harihar Thakur, Resident of Village Rasulpur Gangti, Police Station Goraul, District - Vaishali

¶8

.... .... Appellant/s

¶9

Versus

¶10

1. The State of Bihar 2. The Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Vaishali at Hajipur 3. The Additional Collector, Vaishali at Hajipur 4. The Additional Members Board of Revenue, Patna 5. (a) Khurshid Akram (b) Murshid Akram (c) Majtahid Akram (d)Mustafiq Akram (e) Mehru Nisha

¶11

(f) Sehrun Nisha

¶12

(g) Samsul Nisha (h) Sadru Nisha (i) Badru Nisha (j) Ajrun Nisha, all sons and daughters of Late Mohammad Tashlim

¶13

1. Mohammad Monijul Haque 7. Abdul Hashid 8. Mohammad Moeed 9. Mohammad Mohin 10. Mohammad Hassan 11. Mohammad Shamshad 12. Mohammad Yashin, respondents 6 to 12 are sons of Late Abdul Hakim, all 5 (a) to 12 residents of Village Hassanpur Gangti, P.S. Goraul, District Vaishali

¶14

1. Sarjug Thakur, Son of Lalit Thakur, Resident of Village Rasulpur Gangti, Police Station Goraul, District - Vaishali

¶15

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. B.P. Pandey, Sr. Advocate Mr. Suresh Chandra Giri, Advocate For Respondent Nos. 5 to 12 : Mr. G.K. Jha, Advocate Mr. Sushil Kumar Jha, Advocate Mr. Suryakant Mishra, Advocate

¶16

Patna High Court LPA No.1199 of 1996 dt.17-03-2015

¶17

2/3

¶18

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.N. SINHA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT

¶19

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.N. SINHA) Date: 17-03-2015

¶20

Appellant has filed reply to the counter affidavit, which is taken on record.

¶21

Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the

¶22

respondent.

¶23

Appellant is the vendor. By filing this appeal he is questioning the order of the learned Single Judge of this Court dated 23.05.1996, passed in C.W.J.C. No. 4190 of 1985 whereunder the said writ petition, arising out of preemption matter, has been dismissed holding that the Courts below have consistently recorded concurrent findings of fact to the effect that the writ petitioner-vendee is not a boundary tenant of the lands purchased by him. In that view of the findings the claim of preemption has not only been allowed by the revenue Courts but also affirmed by the writ Court under the judgment impugned. In Paragraph 6 of the impugned judgment, learned Single Judge has also observed that it is difficult for him to reappraise the evidence at the stage of writ proceedings. Matter having been concluded in favour of pre-emptor by three Revenue Courts as also the writ Court, we are not inclined to even entertain the submission of the appellant that in view of the orders impugned he

¶24

Patna High Court LPA No.1199 of 1996 dt.17-03-2015

¶25

3/3

¶26

will become a landless, as such fact was never pleaded right from the beginning before the Revenue Courts as also before the writ Court. The appeal is dismissed.

¶27

(V.N. Sinha, J.)

¶28

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)

¶29

Rajesh/-
U T

Janardan Thakur and Ors. v. State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Janardan Thakur and Ors. v. State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kumari Archana @ Rinu and Anr. Vs Shri Ajit Ranjan

Sunil Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Munna Singh Vs State of Bihar

Sri Hari Narayan Choudhary Vs Smt. Sundari Devi

Ashok Singh and Ors. Vs State of Bihar

Nathan Singh and Ors. Vs State of Bihar