A two-judge bench rejected a review petition filed against an earlier order in a letters patent appeal concerning the substantive writ petition challenged by a group of petitioners against the State of Bihar and government officials.
Civil Review Petition is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Review No.514 of 2012
In
Letters Patent Appeal No. 1151 of 2011
======================================================
Patna High Court C. REV. No.514 of 2012 (4) dt.07-02-2014
2/3
.... .... Petitioners-Appellants-Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Principal Secretary, Personnel and Administrative Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna Cum Chairman, Three Men Committee Of Secretaries, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna.
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
4 07-02-2014 This Petition for review of our order dated 23rd November 2012 made in Letters Patent Appeal No.1151 of 2011 is
Patna High Court C. REV. No.514 of 2012 (4) dt.07-02-2014
3/3
in the nature of a substantive writ petition.
No ground for review is made out.
Civil Review Petition is rejected.
(R.M. Doshit, CJ)
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)
mrl
Vijay Shankar Prasad S/O Late Sarvjit Prasad
Arun Kumar Pandey S/O Late Bishwanath Pandey
The State of Bihar
The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar
The Principal Secretary, Personnel and Administrative Department
The Chief Justice
Ahsanuddin Amanullah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
