Oral order dismissing a miscellaneous jurisdiction petition because the legal representative of respondent no. 4 was absent, preventing the case from proceeding.
The petition was dismissed due to the absence of the legal representative of respondent no. 4.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 547 of 2002
======================================================
6. 03-04-2014 In absence of legal representative of opp. party no.
4, the whole case may not proceed.
The petition stands dismissed.
(Rakesh Kumar, J.)
Anay
Hasan Raza
The State of Bihar
Nasarul Haque (dead heirs substitution)
Rakesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
