The Patna High Court dismissed the miscellaneous application for default as the petitioner had not appeared and defects pointed out by the Registry remained unremedied.
Disposed against the petitioner for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court MJC No.4589 of 2011 (3) dt.03-04-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4589 of 2011
======================================================
Deonath Pd.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar & Ors
.... .... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajani Kant Pandey
For the Respondent/s : Mr. G.K. Agrwal Ga10
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP
SINGH
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI)
3 03-04-2014 Seen the noting of Registry dated 28.3.2014.
No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, when the
case was called out.
Mr. Manish Kumar, learned counsel for the State is present.
In view of the above and in view of the fact that none has
appeared on behalf of the petitioner, and the defects, pointed out
by Registry in its noting, dated 28.3.2014, have not been removed,
this case stands dismissed for default.
(I. A. Ansari, J)
A.I./-
A.I./-
(Samarendra Pratap Singh, J)
Deonath Pd.
The State of Bihar
I. A. Ansari
Samarendra Pratap Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
