The Patna High Court disposed of a contempt application as infructuous because the 2013 compliance order was adhered to by the respondents. It noted the petitioner may approach the court again aggrieved by any compliance order.
The contempt application was disposed of as infructuous since the underlying compliance order was obeyed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court MJC No.3884 of 2013 (2) dt.07-05-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3884 of 2013
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1986 of 2013
====================================================== Mustak Ansari Son of Late Adul Mati Ansari Resident of Mohalla - Mirganj, P.S.- Mirgnj, District - Gopalgnj at present Jail Superintendent Central Jail, Gaya
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIHIR KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER
2 07-05-2014 Learned counsel for the parties agree that the order of this Court dated 31.1.2013 in CWJC No. 1986 of 2013 has been complied. That being so, this contempt application has become infructous and is, accordingly, disposed of.
It, however, goes without saying that if any order has been passed by way of compliance by the opposite parties, which makes the petitioner aggrieved, it would be always open for him to take such remedy as is admissible in law.
(Mihir Kumar Jha, J)
Rishi/-
Mustak Ansari
The State of Bihar through Home Secretary, Amir Subhani
Amir Subhani
Anand Kishore
Mihir Kumar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
