Sudhir Kumar Ojha v. the State of Bihar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
MJC No.3480 of 2010 (21) dt.25-04-2014 IN…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court MJC No.3480 of 2010 (21) dt.25-04-2014
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3480 of 2010 ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
Sudhir Kumar Ojha .... .... Petitioner/s V |
|
| ersus The State of Bihar & Ors. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== |
|
| Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. V.K.Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. (AAG-2) |
|
| ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI) |
|
| 21 | 25-04-2014 Heard Mr. V.K.Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, |
| Mr. D.K.Sinha, learned A.A.G.2, appearing for the contemners | |
| and Mr. Prashant Kr. Chaudhary, learned counsel appearing for | |
| BPSC, Patna. | |
| Learned counsel for the contemners submits that since the | |
| opposite parties-contemners have already made contractual appointment, this contempt application has become infructuous |
|
| and may, therefore, be disposed of accordingly. To the | |
| submissions so made, no objection has been raised on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioners. |
|
| In view of the above, this application, seeking initiation of | |
| the proceedings for the Contempt of Court, is hereby disposed of | |
| as having become infructuous. |
(I. A. Ansari, J)
(Samarendra Pratap Singh, J)
A.I./-
Sudhir Kumar Ojha
The State of Bihar & Ors.
I. A. Ansari
Samarendra Pratap Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court