The court is to be read as having dismissed the application for modification as withdrawn in the interest of justice, as the petitioner had filed a subsequent application for modification under a different miscellaneous jurisdiction case number.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court MJC No.1516 of 2011 (5) dt.21-03-2014
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1516 of 2011 ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
| Mahendra Yadav .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== |
|
| Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Durgesh Nandan For the Respondent/s : Mr. |
|
| ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI) |
|
| 5 | 21-03-2014 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application for modification as subsequently he has filed M. J. C. No. 4853 of 2012. |
| In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this application for modification stands dismissed as withdrawn. |
|
| (I. A. Ansari, J) | |
| A.I./- | (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J) |
Mahendra Yadav
The State Of Bihar
I. A. Ansari
Samarendra Pratap Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
