This court disposed of five writ petitions by noting that they are squarely covered by a prior order of the same court. The writ applications were disposed of in the same terms as the earlier decision without issuing a separate order.
Writ applications disposed of in the same terms as C.W.J.C. No. 17899 of 2012.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8959 of 2014
(Mihir Kumar Jha, J)
Sujit/-
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
C.W.J.C. No. 17899 of 2012Followed¶14
Amlesh Kumar
Bijendra Kumar
Sulochna Kumari
Vikaram Kumar
Ashutosh Kumar
Usha Kumari
Mihir Kumar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
