Multiple writ petitions focusing on postal department employees were disposed of as withdrawn by the split benches. The court allowed withdrawal with liberty to approach the court in the future.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8081 of 2013
======================================================
Versus
======================================================
with
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8085 of 2013
Patna High Court CWJC No.8081 of 2013 (3) dt.02-01-2014
2/4
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
====================================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9768 of 2013
======================================================
with
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5348 of 2013
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
Dinesh Kamti S/O Late Ram Khelawan Kamti R/O Village And P.S.Bahadurpur, District- Darbhanga .... .... Respondent/s ======================================================
with
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5528 of 2013
Patna High Court CWJC No.8081 of 2013 (3) dt.02-01-2014
3/4
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the petitioners : Mr Rakesh Kr.Singh For the respondents : Mr Jayant Kumar Karn (in all the writ petitions) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI)
Patna High Court CWJC No.8081 of 2013 (3) dt.02-01-2014
4/4
3 02-01-2014
Heard Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicants, and Mr. Jayant Kumar Karn, learned counsel for the respondents.
It is submitted, on behalf of the petitioners, that the petitioners are not willing to pursue the writ petitions and they may, therefore, be allowed to withdraw the writ petitions with liberty to approach this Court, with appropriate application, in future, if so advised.
In view of the above submission, made on behalf of the petitioners, these writ petitions are disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to approach this Court, in future, if so advised.
(I. A. Ansari, J)
Shashi.
(Samarendra Pratap Singh, J)
The Union Of India
Satyendra Kumar
I. A. Ansari
Samarendra Pratap Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
