Disposed

Phutesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC15 Jul 2014CWJC/6789/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition filed by a Panchayat Teacher seeking payment of delay工资的. Direction was issued to the Block Development Officer to make an enquiry and pass appropriate orders within one month.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file fresh representation before the Block Development Officer for payment of salary, directing him to pass appropriate orders within one month.

Phutesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2014)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6789 of 2013

¶2

====================================================== Phutesh Kumar, S/o Chhedi Lal Sharma, resident of village - Ranki Tola, P.S. - Beldaur, District - Khagaria .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna 2. The District Magistrate, Khagaria, District - Khagaria 3. District Programme Officer (Establishment), Khagaria, District Khagaria 4. The District Education Officer, District - Khagaria 5. The Block Education Extension Officer, Beldaur, District - Khagaria 6. The Block Development Officer, Beldaur, District - Khagaria 7. The Headmaster, Primary School, Kurhabasa, Block Beldaur, District Khagaria 8. The Mukhia, Gram Panchayat Raj Sakrohar, Block Beldaur, District Khagaria 9. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Sakrohar, Block Beldaur, District - Khagaria .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Ranjeet Kr. Singh, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. M.D. Dwivedi, SC 23 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANANDAN SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶3

3 15-07-2014 The sole grievance of petitioner is that though he has

¶4

been appointed as Panchayat Teacher by letter dated 02.01.2012 vide Annexure-4, he is not being paid his honorarium. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has already filed representations before different authorities in this regard. He also submits that in the counter affidavit filed in this case, respondents have not raised any issue with regard to validity of appointment of the petitioner.

¶5

However, the writ application is disposed of with

¶6

Patna High Court CWJC No.6789 of 2013 (3) dt.15-07-2014

¶7

2/2

¶8

liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Block Development Officer for payment of salary who shall make necessary enquiry and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law in that regard within one month from the date of filing of the representation.

¶9

(Jayanandan Singh, J)

¶10

B.T/U

Phutesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Phutesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunaina Yadav @ Sunayana Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Arun Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Md. Seraj Ahmad and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Nisha Rai Vs The Chancelor Of Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University and Ors.

Prashant Kumar Suman Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sheo Pujan Das and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.