Disposed

Pratima Devi @ Paro Devi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC19 Nov 2014CWJC/5848/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted liberty to the petitioner to file a comprehensive representation seeking compassionate appointment before the District Magistrate, Purnea, within four weeks. The Court directed the authority to decide the claim via a reasoned order within six months.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file a comprehensive representation for compassionate appointment within four weeks; direction to the competent authority to decide the claim with a reasoned order within six months.

Pratima Devi @ Paro Devi Vs The State Of Bihar… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2014)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5848 of 2014

¶2

====================================================== Pratima Devi @ Paro Devi Wife Of Late Madho Rishi Resident Of Village Dhankadih, P.S. Sri Nagar, Distt. Purnea .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary Department of Home, Government of Bihar, Patna 2. The District Magistrate, Purnea 3. The Superintendent of Police, Purnea 4. The Officer-in-Charge, K.Nagar, Police Station Purnea 5. The Circle Officer, K.Nagar, Purnea .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar, AC to SC-17 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶3

2 19-11-2014 Heard the parties.

¶4

In view of the nature of claims raised on behalf of the petitioner in the present proceeding, this Court is of the opinion that the interest of justice shall be sub-served if the petitioner is granted liberty to file a comprehensive representation along with relevant documents including the petition filed by the petitioner for her appointment on compassionate ground before the respondent District Magistrate, Purnea within a period of four weeks from today. It is ordered accordingly.

¶5

If such a fresh comprehensive representation is filed on behalf of the petitioner within the aforesaid period of time with a certified copy of the present order, then the respondent District Magistrate, Purnea either himself or any other competent authority of the respondent State shall be obliged to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner by a reasoned and speaking order at an early date preferably within a maximum period of six months from the date of filing of such representation.

¶6

Patna High Court CWJC No.5848 of 2014 (2) dt.19-11-2014

¶7

2/2

¶8

If on consideration of the materials the competent authority comes to a conclusion that claims raised on behalf of the petitioner are admissible to her3., then consequential order shall also be issued for grant of such admissible claims without any unnecessary further delay.

¶9

It is clarified that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claims raised on behalf of the petitioner in the present writ petition and it is left to be decided by the competent authority strictly in accordance with law.

¶10

The writ petition stands finally disposed of with the observations and directions made above.

¶11

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J)

¶12

BTiwary/-

¶13

Pratima Devi @ Paro Devi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pratima Devi @ Paro Devi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajiv Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Bhagwan Singh Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Birendra Prasad Singh Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Sharawan Kumar Ram @ Sharwan Ram Vs The State Of Bihar

Alok Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Radhe Shyam Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.