The High Court of Patna disposed of a writ application finding it infructuous as the necessary payments had already been made by the respondent university.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12283 of 2008 ====================================================== Baidyanath Gami, son of Late Lakshman Gami, Resident of Village – Bhagwatipur, Police Station – Pandaul, District – Madhubani .... .... Petitioner/s Versus L.N.Mithila University & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar Tewary Mr. Rashmi Kumari Mr. Samir Kumar Bharti Mr. Anil Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. T.N.Maitin Mr. Nivedita Nirvikar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER *************** 14. 01.09.2014 Writ application has become infructuous as payments have been made, which will be evident from the stand taken in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the university, which is not contradicted as such by the petitioner or by his counsel. Writ application is disposed off, accordingly.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)
SKM/-
U
Baidyanath Gami
L.N.Mithila University
AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
