Disposed

Kanchan Kumari v. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secetary, Govt. Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC3 Feb 2014CR. WJC/682/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal writ petition, the petitioner sought release in favor of her husband who is at a remand home. The court directed the lower authority to ascertain whether the petitioner is major or minor and ordered her release on her own favor if found major, subsequently disposing of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on her own favor if found major; petition disposed of.

Kanchan Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Chief… — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2014)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ No.682 of 2013

¶2

====================================================== 1. Kanchan Kumari Wife Of Ganesh Paswan And Daughter Of Jai Kishun Sah Resident Of Village Sursand, Ward No 9 P.S. Sursand Distt Sitamarhi.

¶3

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar 2. The Director General Of Police Bihar Patna 3. The Inspector General Of Police Muzaffarpur Range, Muzaffarpur 4. The Deputy Inspector General Of Police, Tirhut Division Muzaffarpur 5. The Superintendent Of Police, Sitamarhi Distt Sitamarhi. 6. The Deputy Superintendent Of Police, Sitamarhi Sadar, Distt Sitamarhi 7. The Station Head Officer, Runnisaidpur Police Station Distt Sitamarhi 8. The Superintendent, Mahila Alpwas Grih, Kailashpuri, Dumra, Sitamarhi 9. Shiv Jyoti Devi, Wife Of Jai Kishun Sah Resident Of Village Manik Chak P.S. Runnisaidpur Distt Sitamarhi. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Respondent/s : Mr. SC-3. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER

¶4

3 03-02-2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the J.C. to SC No.3.

¶5

Petitioner has asked for her release in favour of her husband who for the present is at Remand Home as per judicial order.

¶6

Simple contention has been made on behalf of the petitioner that as she happens to be major, therefore, she may be directed to be released. The learned Lower Court will ascertain the fact whether petitioner happens to be major or minor. In case,

¶7

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.682 of 2013 (3) dt.03-02-2014

¶8

¶9

petitioner is found major, then she will be released on her own

¶10

favour.

¶11

With the aforesaid direction, this instant petition is

¶12

disposed of.

¶13

(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J)

¶14

B.Kr./-

Kanchan Kumari v. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secetary, Govt. Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kanchan Kumari v. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secetary, Govt. Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dilip Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Gopal Sah Vs The State Of Bihar Through Secretary, Law Department and Ors.

Ram Baran Roy Vs the State of Bihar

Dr. Prema Jha Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Mukesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar Through Principal Secretary, Home, Govt. Of Bihar and Ors.

Kapil Deo Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.