Petitioners sought permission to withdraw their appeal to raise grounds at the charge-framing stage. The court dismissed the application as withdrawn with liberty to raise grounds later.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.52855 of 2013
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -41 Year- 2011 Thana -PURANHIA District- SHEOHAR ====================================================== 1. Bindeshwar Rai Son Of Late Basudeo Rai Resident Of Village- Andauli, P.S.- Parihar, District- Sitamarhi 2. Jugeshwar Rai Son Of Late Basudeo Rai Resident Of Village- Andauli, P.S.- Parihar, District- Sitamarhi 3. Ram Lochan Rai Son Of Late Basudeo Rai Resident Of Village- Andauli, P.S.- Parihar, District- Sitamarhi 4. Raj Kumar Rai Son Of Bindeshwar Rai Resident Of Village- Andauli, P.S.- Parihar, District- Sitamarhi .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pradip Nr.Kumar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER
2 18-11-2014 After some arguments, Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission to withdraw the application in order to enable him to raise all the grounds at the stage of framing of the charge. The application is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
(Ashutosh Kumar, J)
Jagdish/-
U T
Bindeshwar Rai and others
The State Of Bihar
Ashutosh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
