Allowed

Chanda Karmakar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC16 Dec 2014CR. MISC./50326/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants bail to the petitioner in a case involving theft under Section 379 IPC. The petitioner was released on a bond of Rs. 5,000 with two sureties, subject to strict conditions regarding antecedents, address changes, and court appearances.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail furnishing bond of Rs. 5,000 with two sureties of like amount subject to conditions.

Chanda Karmakar Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2014)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.50326 of 2014

¶2

Arising Out of Civil Lines P.S. Case No.524 Year- 2014 Thana -CIVIL LINE District- GAYA ====================================================== Chanda Karmakar, wife of Raj Karmakar, resident of Howrah, P.S. Sisda, Distt. Hugli Ka Nagarh (West Bengal) .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Syed Asgher Najmi, Adv. For the State : Mr. Subhash Chandra Mishra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 2 16-12-2014 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State. The Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶3

Considering that no incriminating articles have been recovered from the possession of the Petitioner and he has fair antecedent, let the Petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the Court below to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with Civil Lines P.S. Case No. 524 of 2014 subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any

¶4

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50326 of 2014 (2) dt.16-12-2014

¶5

2/2

¶6

change in the address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the Petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

¶7

(Anjana Prakash, J)

¶8

S.Ali/-

¶9

U T

Chanda Karmakar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chanda Karmakar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Radha Devi @ Radha Kumari and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Shobha Kumari Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Brij Bihari Singh and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Satendra Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Ajay Kumar @ Futani Vs The State Of Bihar

Shambhu Pandit Vs The State Of Bihar