The High Court of Patna rejected the petitioner's prayer for bail in Sessions Trial cases involving offences under the IPC and Arms Act, declining to review the earlier rejection as examination of witnesses had commenced.
Prayer for bail rejected and earlier refusal of bail not reviewed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.47246 of 2013
====================================================== 1. Naushad @ Md. Naushad Alam Son Of Manglu Resident Of VillageKumliya, (Ramnagar), P.S.- Palasi, District- Araria. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== With Criminal Miscellaneous No.51860 of 2013 ====================================================== 1. Naushad @ Md. Naushad Alam Son Of Manglu Resident Of Village - Kumhiya, Police Station Palasi, District - Araria .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : (In Cr.Misc. No.47246 of 2013) For the Petitioner/s : Md. Ziaul Quamar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Pushpa Sinha-2, A.P.P. (In Cr.Misc. No.51860 of 2013) For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Ziaul Quamar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. A.H.M. Rahman, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 5 12-02-2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in Jokihat P.S. case No.185 of 2012 (Sessions Trial No.1065 of 2013) and Palasi P.S. case No.57 of 2012 (Sessions Trial No.649 of 2013) instituted for the offence under Sections 489A, 489B, 489C of the Indian Penal Code and 25(1-B)A, 26 of the Arms Act, pending before Adhoc A.D.J. IV, Araria.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47246 of 2013 (5) dt.12-02-2014
2
Considering that the examination of witnesses is well under
way, I am not inclined to review the earlier order refusing bail to the petitioner.
Prayer for bail is once again rejected.
The Trial Court is directed to abide by the trial plan.
(Anjana Prakash, J)
Narendra/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite examination of witnesses being underway?
Whether the earlier order refusing bail should be reviewed?
Naushad @ Md. Naushad Alam
The State Of Bihar
Anjana Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
