Petitioner sought quashing of an order refusing an application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. High Court found no reason to interfere and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.44763 of 2014
| Arising Out of PS.Case No. -44 Year- 2010 Thana -DARAUNDA District- SIWAN ====================================================== 1. Mantoo Singh son of Shyam Bahadur Singh, resident of Village - Senduwar Bhagwan Tola, P.S. - Janta Bazar, District - Saran. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramchandra Sahni, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar 2, APP ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER |
|
| 2 | 04-12-2014 The Petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated |
| 9.9.2014 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge 1st, | |
| Siwan, by which he has refused an application under Section 311 | |
| Cr.P.C. in Sessions Trial No.527 of 2011 arising out of Daraunda P.S. case No.44 of 2010. |
|
| Having gone through the impugned order, I see no | |
| reason for interference. | |
| The application stands dismissed. |
(Anjana Prakash, J)
Narendra/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the Additional District and Sessions Judge's refusal to allow an application under Section 311 Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mantoo Singh
The State of Bihar
Anjana Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
