Allowed

Ram Raj Ram and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC23 Jan 2014CR. MISC./39939/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court released the petitioners on anticipatory bail in a cognizable case under Sections 379/34 IPC, subject to conditions regarding sureties, antecedents, and surrender within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Released on anticipatory bail contingent upon surrender within four weeks and compliance with specific conditions regarding sureties and court appearances.

Ram Raj Ram and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2014)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 39939 of 2013

¶2

=================================================== 1. Ram Raj Ram S/o Late Ramdev Ram Resident of VillageDhanechha, P.S.- Durgawati, District- Kaimur (Bhabua). 2. Dharmendra Ram @ Dharmendra Kumar S/o Ram Raj Ram Resident of Village-Dhanechha, P.S.- Durgawati, District- Kaimur (Bhabua). .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ===================================================

¶3

CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER

¶4

02. 23.01.2014

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the

¶6

State.

¶7

The Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Section 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶8

Considering the nature of material that has transpired against the Petitioners and the fact that they have fair antecedents, let them be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/(Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur (Bhabhua) in connection with Durgawati P.S. Case No. 58 of 2013 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2)

¶9

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39939 of 2013 (2) dt.23-01-2014

¶10

¶11

of the Code of Criminal Procedure as also subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioners. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioners. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioners are not an accused in any other case and if they are they shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the Petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the Petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled.

¶12

(Anjana Prakash, J.)

¶13

Vikash/-

Ram Raj Ram and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Raj Ram and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lal Mohar Gosain and Ors. Vs State of Bihar

Jungi Yadav @ Jungi Singh Vs State of Bihar

Awadh Paswan and Ors. Vs State of Bihar

Sunil Sahani and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Shambhu Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar

Ajay Kumar Gupta Vs The State Of Bihar