Santosh Ram v. State Of Bihar and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Patna confirmed an order granting provisional anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with a complaint case, upholding the decision of the Chief Judicial Magistrate at Rohtas on the same terms.
What did the court decide?
Provisional anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner by the order dated 10.1.2014 was confirmed on the same terms.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.38575 of 2013
Arising Out of Complaint Case No.316 Year- 2012 District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Santosh Ram Son Of Mahunga Ram, Resident Of Village - Pithiwan, Police Station- Chenari, District- Rohtas .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Sabitri Devi, Wife Of Santosh Ram, Resident Of Village - Pithiwan, Police Station- Chenari, District- Rohtas at present Mahmadpur, Police Station - Baddi, District- Rohtas .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, Adv. For the State : Mr. Amrendra Pd., APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 5 26-11-2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner was allowed Provisional anticipatory bail by the order dated 10.1.2014.
In the nature of dispute between the Parties, the matter was referred to the Mediation Centre but unfortunately, it could not be resolved at that stage.
Considering the merits of the case, Provisional anticipatory bail granted to the Petitioner by the order dated 10.1.2014 in connection with Complaint Case No. 316 of 2012 to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram, is hereby confirmed on the same terms.
(Anjana Prakash, J) S.Ali/U T
S.Ali/-
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order granting provisional anticipatory bail to the petitioner should be confirmed on the same terms.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Santosh Ram Son Of Mahunga Ram
- respondent
The State Of Bihar
- respondent
Sabitri Devi
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court