Allowed

Ramesh Kumar Kashyap @ Ramesh Prasad Kashyap v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC26 Nov 2014CR. MISC./24389/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a complaint case under Sections 406 and 420 IPC. The court observed the allegations arose from a purported civil dispute regarding non-repayment of money and allowed bail upon furnishing a bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Dehri.

Ramesh Kumar Kashyap @ Ramesh Prasad Kashyap Vs State Of… — Money Laundering | Patna HC (2014)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24389 of 2014 (5) dt.26-11-2014

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.24389 of 2014

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -238 Year- 2013 Thana -ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== 1. Ramesh Kumar Kashyap @ Ramesh Prasad Kashyap S/o Late Shri Sah Resident of Mohalla Barah Pathar, Ward No. 36, P.S. Dehri, District Rohtas.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar.

¶5

Jitendra Kumar @ Rinku Soni S/o Gauri Shanker Prasad R/o Mohalla Babuganj, Ward No. 35, P.S. Dehri, District Rohtas.

¶6

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶7

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashutosh Tripathy For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 5 26-11-2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Complaint Case No. 238 of 2013. 3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in a transaction business which is in the nature of pure civil dispute involving failure to repay money only.

¶8

Learned counsel for the complainant appears and has been heard who opposes the anticipatory bail petition.

¶9

Having regard to the entirety of the facts and

¶10

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24389 of 2014 (5) dt.26-11-2014

¶11

circumstances of the case, in the event of the petitioner’s arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Dehri, District- Rohtas, in connection with Complaint Case No. 238 of 2013, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.

¶12

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶13

Md. Ibrarul/-

¶14

U T

Ramesh Kumar Kashyap @ Ramesh Prasad Kashyap v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramesh Kumar Kashyap @ Ramesh Prasad Kashyap v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Israil Vs The State Of Bihar

Arjun Sah and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Bindeshwari Prasad Singh and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Rakesh Kumar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Suresh Paswan and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Upendra Singh @ Upendra Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar