The High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner arrested under various IPC sections. Bail was allowed on a bond with sureties subject to specified conditions.
Petitioner released on anticipatory bail on Rs. 10,000 with two sureties subject to conditions of Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.23292 of 2014
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -394 Year- 2012 Thana -MUFFASIL DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ====================================================== 1. Sk. Serazul S/o - Late Sk.. Doma, Resident of Village - Beldari, P.S. - Bettiah Mufassil, Dist. - West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : APP
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
2 25-08-2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23292 of 2014 (2) dt.25-08-2014
2
on a better footing than the co-accused Manirul Haque @ Sheikh Monirul Haque, Sheikh Najiban and Sheikh Hashin who have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Cr. Misc.No.22001 of 2013.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Chandran
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in the present case.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sk. Serazul S/o - Late Sk.. Doma
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
