The High Court of Patna orally dismissed the criminal miscellaneous application as infructuous since witnesses had been examined and charges framed.
Application dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.20833 of 2012
====================================================== Sona Lal Singh, Son of Late Ramlakhan Singh, Resident of Village Pokhrera, P.S. Saraiya, District Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Laxmi Narayan Singh, Son of Late Gokhul Singh, Resident of Village Loksa, P.S. Motihari Muffasil, District East Champaran. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sangeet Deokuliar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 03-11-2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Opposite Party No. 2 and the State. Mr. Sangeet Deokuliar, learned advocate for the petitioner very fairly submits that pursuant to framing of charges, witnesses have been examined in this case and the application has become infructuous.
The application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(Ashutosh Kumar, J.)
Sanjay/-
U T
Sona Lal Singh
The State of Bihar
Laxmi Narayan Singh
Ashutosh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
