Dismissed

Rajendra Singh Yadav @ Rajendra Singh and Ors. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC21 Nov 2014CR. MISC./18093/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Petitioners sought quashing of a nondischarge order. The High Court dismissed the application, noting Section 307 IPC was not made out, but directed the trial court to conclude the trial expeditiously without unjustified adjournments.

What did the court decide?

The application stands dismissed; the Trial Court is directed to conclude the trial expeditiously.

Rajendra Singh Yadav @ Rajendra Singh and Ors. Vs… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Patna HC (2014)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.18093 of 2014

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -63 Year- 2011 Thana -DAUDNAGAR District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== 1. Rajendra Singh Yadav @ Rajendra Singh 2. Yamuna Yadav Both are sons of Late Briksha Yadav 3. Gulti @ Ranjit Kumar Son of Rajendra Yadav 4. Brajesh Yadav Son of Yamuna Yadav 5. Lawkesh Kumar Son of Yogendra Singh 6. Rameshwar Singh

¶3

Binod Kumar Both Sons of Dudheshwar Singh

¶4

Mukesh Kumar Son of Rameshwar Singh 9. Moti Yadav Son of Late Raghu Yadav, All resident of Village - Nawratan chak tola Kunji Bigaha, P.S. - Daudnagar, District - Aurangabad

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus 1. The State of Bihar

¶7

Vinay Singh Son of Ramashish Singh Village - Kunji Bigaha Nawratan chak, P.S. - Daudnagar, District - Aurangabad

¶8

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Janam Maharaj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nityanand Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 21-11-2014 The Petitioners seek quashing of the order of nondischarge dated 21.1.2014 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge 1^st , Aurangabad in Sessions Trial No.250 of 2013/314 of 2013 arising out of Daudnagar P.S. case No.63 of 2011. It has been submitted that in the facts of the case no

¶10

offence under Section 307 I.P.C. is made out. Considering that even if charge under Section 307 is

¶11

framed no prejudice would be caused to the Petitioners, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter.

¶12

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18093 of 2014 (2) dt.21-11-2014

¶13

2/2

¶14

The application stands dismissed.

¶15

The Trial Court is directed to conclude the trial expeditiously without granting unnecessary adjournments to any party. For which reason he shall send a list of the witnesses fixing specific dates for each witness for their examination along with a copy of this order to the S.P., Aurangabad, who is directed to ensure the attendance of the witnesses on the date fixed by the Trial Court so that there is no further delay in the trial.

¶16

(Anjana Prakash, J)

¶17

Narendra/-

¶18

U T

Rajendra Singh Yadav @ Rajendra Singh and Ors. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajendra Singh Yadav @ Rajendra Singh and Ors. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Birendra Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Atma Ram Choudhary and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Ram Pravesh Thakur @ Pravesh Kumar Thakur Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Maman Kumar Agrawal Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Parvendra Singh @ Permendar Kr. Singh Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Satendra Kumar @ Satendra Yadav and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.