, this Court rejected the application for bail, considering the petitioner killed his parents due to a pension dispute.
Prayer for bail stands rejected at this stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.17054 of 2014 ====================================================== Ramanuj Yadav, S/o Shivan Yadav, Resident of Village - Mogalchak, P.S. Belchhi, District Patna. .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar Kashyap, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Chandra Bhushan Pd., APP. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 2 26-05-2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case which has been registered under Sections 323, 307, 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code in Belchhi P.S. Case No. 40/2013. Allegedly the petitioner, his son and wife due to non-fulfillment of demand of pension money from the informant and her husband, the petitioner and others brutally assaulted the informant and her husband by lathi causing death of her husband and later on death of the informant also.
On behalf of the petitioner learned counsel submits that the brother of the petitioner has got falsely implicated all the family members of the petitioner to grab his share, he has got no
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17054 of 2014 (2) dt.26-05-2014
2
criminal antecedent and the allegations are omnibus in nature to which the learned APP opposes.
Having considered the submissions urged at the Bar, going through the FIR, impugned order, record and noticing that the petitioner and others have killed the father and mother both due to non-fulfillment of demand of pension amount and as such this Court is not inclined to enlarge the above named petitioner on bail and accordingly, his such prayer for bail stands rejected at this stage.
(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.)
KKSINHA/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail in a case involving double murder arising from an assault due to non-payment of pension?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ramanuj Yadav
The State of Bihar
Jitendra Mohan Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
