The High Court of Patna dismissed an application filed under Section 482 CrPC as a second revision, holding it impermissible in law as the appropriate forum had already been approached.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.13109 of 2013
| ====================================================== 1. Naveen Yadav S/O Mohan Yadav 2. Chandan Yadav S/O Mohan Yadav 3. Bipin Yadav S/O Mohan Yadav 4. Sadan Yadav S/O Mohan Yadav 5. Muni Devi W/O Sri Bipin Yadav 6. Babita Devi W/O Sri Sadan Yadav 7. Mohan Yadav S/O Late Etwari Yadav 8. Sona Devi W/O Sri Mohan Yadav All are resident of village Kapasiya, P.S. Kaukol, District - Nawadah. .... .... Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. Narayan Yadav S/O Sohrai Yadav Resident Of Village Chhitma, P.S. + District Jamui. .... .... Opposite Parties |
|
|---|---|
| ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER |
|
| 2 01 |
-05-2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The present application though filed under 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is, as a matter of fact, a second revision which is not permissible in law. Accordingly, the application is dismissed. |
| Jagdish/- | (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) |
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Naveen Yadav
Chandan Yadav
Bipin Yadav
Sadan Yadav
Muni Devi
Babita Devi
Ashwani Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
