In oral order dated 01-04-2014, the Patna High Court dismissed the miscellaneous application as infructuous based on counsel's submission.
Application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11414 of 2013 (2) dt.01-04-2014
| IN THE HIGH CO Criminal ================== |
URT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous No.11414 of 2013 =================================== |
|
|---|---|---|
Alok Kumar Khemka S/ Samastipur, P.S- Samastip 1. The State Of Bihar ================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : ================== CORAM: HONOURAB SINGH ORAL ORDER |
O Om Prakash Khamka Resident Of Arya Road, ur, District- Samastipur. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus .... .... Opposite Party/s ==================================== Mr. Amitab Bharadwah, Advocate. ==================================== LE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR |
|
| 2 01 |
-04-2014 Learned application has becom |
counsel for the petitioner submits that the e infructuous. |
| In that dismissed as infructuo |
view of the matter, the application is us. |
|
| Jagdish/- | (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) |
Alok Kumar Khemka / Om Prakash Khamka
State Of Bihar
Ashwani Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
