The High Court of Patna dismissed the petition for anticipatory bail filed by the petitioner, who was apprehending arrest in a case involving offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, citing no grounds for the privilege. No relief was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 10149 of 2014
================================================== Amar Kumar @ Manish Kumar son of Gagandeo Sah, resident of village- Raniganj Chakiya, P.S. Chakiya, District East Champaran.
.... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vikas Ratan Bharti, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. S.B.Singh, APP ================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3. 28-04-2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Shyam Bihari Singh, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor. The petitioner, apprehending his arrest in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 318 of 2012 registered for the offence under Sections 385, 506, 467, 468, 471, 420, 387 & 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, has prayed for grant of anticipatory bail.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that mobile number, from which ransom was made, does not belong to the petitioner. He further submits that only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused, the petitioner has been made accused. He further submits that the petitioner has got clean antecedent.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10149 of 2014 (3) dt.28-04-2014
2/2
I do not find any ground for extending the
privilege of anticipatory bail.
The petition stands dismissed.
(Rakesh Kumar, J.)
Anay
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner apprehending arrest in connection with offences under Sections 385, 506, 467, 468, 471, 420, 387 and 120(B) of IPC.
Amar Kumar @ Manish Kumar
The State of Bihar
Rakesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
