Full Bench judgment in Kalpana Rani case relied upon. Present Letters Patent Appeal dismissed in limine without addressing merits due to binding precedent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No. 559 of 2012
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 8836 of 2011
======================================================
Anjum Ara @ Bibi Anjum Ara, wife of Md. Rizwan Ahmad, resident of Village- Khurasan, P.O.- Rasalpur, P.S.- Salkhua, Distt.- Saharsa .... .... Petitioner-Appellant Versus
.... .... Respondents
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant : Mr. Manish, Advocate For the Respondents-State: Mr. Mahboob Ashraf, AC to SC 27
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
And
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
Patna High Court LPA No.559 of 2012 (2) dt.14-07-2014
2 / 2
matter of Kalpana Rani vs. The State of Bihar & Ors. {2014
(2) PLJR 665}, Appeal is dismissed in limine.
(R.M. Doshit, CJ)
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)
Sanjeet/U
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Kalpana Rani vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.Relied on¶25
Kalpana Rani vs. The State of Bihar & Ors. {2014 (2) PLJR 665}
Anjum Ara @ Bibi Anjum Ara
The State of Bihar
R.M. Doshit
Ashwani Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
