Budhan Rai v. Doman Rai and Ors.
Patna HCSA/532/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
SA No.532 of 2011 (11) dt.12-08-2013 IN THE…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
Patna High Court SA No.532 of 2011 (11) dt.12-08-2013
¶2
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Second Appeal No.532 of 2011 ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
Budhan Rai .... .... Appellant/s Versus Doman Rai & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== |
|
| Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey For the Respondent/s : |
|
| ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER |
|
| 11 | 12-08-2013 It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that in the |
| first page of the order passed by this Court dated 29.04.2013, P.S. | |
| of the respondents while describing their address has been wrongly mentioned as “Mahrakh” in place of “Mashrakh”. |
|
| Let “Mahrakh” be read as “Mashrakh”. Further in the second line at page 3 “were” has wrongly |
|
| been typed as “wee”. Let “wee” be read as “were”. | |
| Saif/- (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.) |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Budhan Rai
- respondent
Doman Rai & Ors
Coram
AI extract
Chakradhari Sharan Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court