In this second appeal, the appellant failed to appear despite repeated calls. The Patna High Court dismissed the appeal by default.
Appeal dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court SA No.361 of 2000 (12) dt.10-04-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Second Appeal No.361 of 2000
======================================================
Jagdish Saw Sonar & Ors
.... .... Appellant/s
Versus
Ragho Saw
.... .... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Sharma No-1
Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh
For the Respondent/s : Mr.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI
SHARAN SINGH
ORAL ORDER
12 10-04-2013 Despite repeated calls no one appears on behalf of the
appellants.
This appeal is dismissed for default.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)
AnilKrSinha/-
Jagdish Saw Sonar & Ors
Ragho Saw
Chakradhari Sharan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
