Tulsi Prasad v. Om Prakash Gupta
Case brief
What is this about?
Appellant withdrew Second Appeal as infructuous. Court allowed withdrawal and dismissed appeal.
What did the court decide?
Withdrawal of Second Appeal allowed; appeal dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
Patna High Court SA No.192 of 2010 (5) dt.01-04-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Second Appeal No.192 of 2010
====================================================== Tulsi Prasad son of Late Ram Chandra Prasad resident of Mohalla- Purani Ashpatal Road, Ward No. 3, P.S. and Distt.- Jehanabad. .... .... Appellant Versus Om Prakash Gupta son of Late Ram Briksh Prasad resident of Mohalla Purani Ashpatal Road, Ward No. 3, P.S. Distt.-Jehanabad, at present residing Jai Rampur Colliery, Jharia, P.S. Tisra, Distt. Dhanbad. .... .... Respondent ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant : Mr. Ram Hriday Prasad Mr. Bihswa Nath Chouhary For the Respondent : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH
ORAL ORDER
5 01-04-2013 Learned counsel for the appellant Mr. Ram Hriday Prasad submits that he has been instructed to withdraw the Second Appeal as the same has become infructuous. The prayer is allowed. The Second Appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)
Saif/-
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Tulsi Prasad
- respondent
Om Prakash Gupta
Coram
Chakradhari Sharan Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court