The Patna High Court dismissed a review petition and an interlocutory application filed by the Union of India challenging a previous order in Letters Patent Appeal No. 56 of 2012, holding them devoid of merit.
Review petition and Interlocutory Application rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Review No. 150 of 2012
In
Letters Patent Appeal No. 56 of 2012
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7709 of 2002
With
Interlocutory Application No. 2171 of 2012
In
Civil Review No. 150 of 2012
======================================================
.... .... Appellants - Petitioners
Versus
Ravindra Kumar Gupta, son of Sunder Sah, Resident of Village – Bansdiha, P.S. Kopa, District – Saran, Bihar
.... .... Respondent - Respondent
====================================================== Appearance:
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binay Kumar Pandey, Advocate.
For the Respondent/s : -----
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
5 13-09-2013 This petition for review of our order dated 25th January 2012 made in Letters Patent Appeal No. 56 of 2012 by the appellant Union of India is devoid of any merit.
Patna High Court C. REV. No.150 of 2012 (5) dt.13-09-2013
2/2
The review petition and the Interlocutory Application are rejected.
(R.M. Doshit, CJ)
(Birendra Prasad Verma, J) Dilip.
Union of India
Ravindra Kumar Gupta
R.M. Doshit
Birendra Prasad Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
