A petition filed under writ jurisdiction seeking contempt proceedings regarding the non-compliance of a directed order to engage an Anganbari Sewika. The court examined the status and dismissed the application.
Application dismissed as not a fit case for contempt proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.87 of 2012
====================================================== 1. Indu Kumari D/O Naresh Mahto, W/O Ramsagar Mahto R/O VillageModdingaar, District- Lakhisarai .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. District Magistrate At Lakhisarai 3. Block Development Officer, Halsi, Lakhisarai 4. Agriculture Block Officer, Halsi, Lakhisarai 5. Sri Dinesh Mandal, Mukhiya Village- Dira Moddinagar Gram Panchayat, P.S. And Anchal- Halsi, Distt.- Lakhisarai 6. Anita Kumari D/O Ramlakhan Pandit, W/O Asitk Pandit R/O Village + P.O.- Mohaddinagar, P.S. And Anchal- Halsi, Distt.- Lakhisarai 7. Bihar School Examination Board, Patna Through Secretary P.N. No. 612 2226916 .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Muneshwar Prasad For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anjani Kumar, A.A.G.-X ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANANDAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 4 08-07-2013 From the order passed in the writ matter, it does not appear that the Collector, who was directed to take steps for regular engagement of Anganbari Sewika, was to comply the same within a specified period. When the case was called out on 4.7.2013, learned counsel for the petitioner was not present. Today also a prayer is being made on his behalf for pass over. From Annexure-1 to the writ application, it appears that the appointment of reserved category candidate as Anganbari Sewika has already been made. Hence, this Court does not find
Patna High Court MJC No.87 of 2012 (4) dt.08-07-2013
2/2
that this is a fit case in which any contempt proceeding should be
drawn.
This application is dismissed.
(Jayanandan Singh, J)
Pradeep/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the case is fit for contempt proceedings given the current state of appointment.
Indu Kumari D/O Naresh Mahto
The State Of Bihar
Jayanandan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
