Nawal Kishore Pd. v. the State of Bihar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Oral order confirming receipt of payments and disposing of a miscellaneous application without further orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.78 of 2012 In
| Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 10065 of 2010 | |
|---|---|
| ====================================================== | |
| Nawal Kishore Prasad, S/O Late Kapildeo Narayan Lal, R/O 104, Pranav Apartment, Park Road, Kadamkuan, Police Station - Kadamkuan, Town & District - Patna .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Navin Kumar, Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna 3. Deepak Kumar, Secretary, Department of Personnel & Administrative Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna 4. I.S. Dhariwal, Accountant General (A & E) Bihar, Birchand Patel Marg, Patna. 5. Hon’ble High Court, through Registrar General, Birendra Kumar .... .... Opposite Parties/Contemnors ====================================================== |
|
| Appearance : For the Petitioner : Md. Bahauddin, Advocate. |
|
| For the State : Mr. Manoj Kr. Ambastha, G.P. 14 |
|
| For the Accountant General: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER |
|
| (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) | |
| 12 | 16-05-2013 Learned Advocate Md. Bahauddin appears for the petitioner. He states that all payments have been received. M.J.C. stands disposed of. (R.M. Doshit, CJ) |
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)
Sujit/-
Nawal Kishore Prasad
The State of Bihar
Navin Kumar
Deepak Kumar
I.S. Dhariwal
R.M. Doshit
Ahsanuddin Amanullah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court