In this oral order, the Patna High Court disposed of a contempt application where the learned counsel for petitioners admitted compliance with the impugned order passed in writ proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court MJC No.4768 of 2012 (5) dt.03-07-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4768 of 2012
Versus
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar, A.C. to S.C.-14 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners admits to the compliance of the order passed in the writ proceeding.
In the circumstances, this contempt application stands disposed
of.
(Jyoti Saran, J)
SKPathak/-
Hari Narayan Baitha, Narendra Kumar Mishra, Shankar Rai, Bhukalu Ram, Shiv Gulam Paswan, Nathuni Paswan, Birendra Kumar, Dhanush Raut
The State of Bihar, Smt. Ashwini Dutt Thakre, Shri Rajesh Kumar, Mahesh Thakur
Jyoti Saran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
