In a contempt petition alleging violation of a prior order directing filing of a representation, the Court held that in contempt jurisdiction, the Court cannot go into the merit of the impugned order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3205 of 2012 In
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1064 of 2009
====================================================== Dinesh Kumar Sharma S/O Ramjap Sharma R/O Village - Shitalpur, P.S. Dighwara, District - Saran ( Chapra ) At Present Resident Of Jagannath Singh Lane, Choudhary Tola, P.S. Sultanganj, Town & District - Patna .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar
.... .... Opp. Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Utsav Kumar, Advocate
For the Opp. Party/s : Mr. Dhirendra Kumar, AC to AAG 14
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.N. HUSSAIN and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.N. HUSSAIN)
Patna High Court MJC No.3205 of 2012 (5) dt.09-07-2013
2/2
were directed to dispose of the said representation in accordance with law within three months from the date of its filing.
of.
(S.N. Hussain, J)
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)
Anjani/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court while exercising contempt jurisdiction can go into the merit of the order complied with by the respondents.
Dinesh Kumar Sharma
The State Of Bihar
Abhayanand
S.N. Hussain
Ahsanuddin Amanullah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
